Category Filter
Asset Publisher
Filsuvez (birch triterpenes) Prior Authorization Program Summary
Policy Number: PH-91219
This program applies to Blue Partner, Commercial, GenPlus, NetResults A series, SourceRx and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies.
POLICY REVIEW CYCLE
Effective Date |
Date of Origin |
01-01-2025 |
07-01-2024 |
FDA LABELED INDICATIONS AND DOSAGE
Agent(s) |
FDA Indication(s) |
Notes |
Ref# |
Filsuvez® (birch triterpenes) Topical gel |
For the treatment of wounds associated with dystrophic and junctional epidermolysis bullosa in adult and pediatric patients 6 months of age and older |
|
1 |
See package insert for FDA prescribing information: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm
CLINICAL RATIONALE
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) |
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) encompasses a number of disorders characterized by recurrent blister formation as the result of structural fragility within the skin and selected other tissues caused by mutations in CLO7A1, the gene encoding the anchoring fibril component, collagen VII. All types and subtypes of EB are rare; the overall incidence and prevalence of the disease within the United States is approximately 19 per one million live births and 8 per one million population, respectively. Clinical manifestations range widely, from localized blistering of the hands and feet to generalized blistering of the skin and oral cavity, and injury to many internal organs.(2) EB types are divided into four main groups according to the depth below the skin surface at which the blisters occur. Approximately 20% of EB cases are dystrophic (DEB), 10% junctional (JEB), and 70% simplex (EBS); Kindler syndrome is very rare. The genetic errors in EB result in defects in the proteins that make the outer skin layer (epidermis) adhere to the deeper layer (dermis). Some types of EB are inherited dominantly, others are inherited recessively. There are more than 30 clinical subtypes. Each EB subtype is known to arise from mutations within the genes encoding for several different proteins, each of which is intimately involved in the maintenance of keratinocyte structural stability or adhesion of the keratinocyte to the underlying dermis. EB is best diagnosed and subclassified by the collective findings obtained via detailed personal and family history, in concert with the results of immunofluorescence antigenic mapping, transmission electron microscopy, and in some cases, by DNA analysis.(2,4) Optimal patient management requires a multidisciplinary approach and revolves around the protection of susceptible tissues against trauma, use of sophisticated wound care dressings, aggressive nutritional support, and early medical or surgical interventions to correct whenever possible the extracutaneous complications. Prognosis varies considerably and is based on both EB subtype and the overall health of the patient. Currently, there is no cure for EB. Supportive care includes daily wound care, bandaging, and pain management as needed.(2) |
Efficacy |
The efficacy of Filsuvez for the treatment of partial-thickness wounds associated with inherited EB was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults and pediatric subjects 6 months of age and older (EASE; NCT03068780) with dystrophic EB (DEB) and junctional EB (JEB). Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive Filsuvez (n=109) or placebo topical gel (n=114) and instructed to apply approximately 1 mm (0.04 inch) of the investigational product to all their wounds at each dressing change (every 1 to 4 days) for 90 days (+/- 7 days). If a treated wound became infected, it was advised to discontinue treatment to that wound until the infection had resolved. At randomization, 1 wound was selected by the investigator as the target wound for the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint. The target wound was defined as a partial-thickness wound of 10-50 cm^2 in surface area and present for 21 days to 9 months prior to screening. Of the 223 subjects randomized, the median age was 12 years (range: 6 months to 81 years), 70% were under 18 years of age, and 60% were male and 40% were female. Eighty three (83)% of subjects were White, 5% were Asian, 1% were Black or African American, and 10% were other races or did not have race recorded. For ethnicity, 35% identified as Hispanic or Latino and 65% identified as not Hispanic or Latino. Of these 223 subjects, 195 had DEB, of which 175 subjects had recessive DEB (RDEB) and 20 had dominant DEB (DDEB); in addition, there were 26 subjects with JEB and 2 subjects with EB simplex. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (SCC) was reported as an adverse event in the double-blind and open-label periods of EASE. Four subjects with recessive dystrophic EB each reported one SCC.(1) EASE’s top-line findings showed that the trial met its main goal, with a significantly greater proportion of Filsuvez-treated patients exhibiting wound closure within 45 days, compared with those using a placebo gel (41.3% vs. 28.9%). This benefit was exclusive to participants with recessive DEB, who showed a 72% higher likelihood of wound closure within 45 days with Filsuvez relative to a placebo gel. No significant differences in wound closure were detected between Filsuvez and a placebo among participants with dominant DEB or JEB. Recessive DEB is commonly more severe than dominant DEB. While a greater proportion of patients using Filsuvez showed wound closure within three months, faster than those on the placebo gel, these differences failed to reach statistical significance. All participants who completed the three-month period entered the study’s extension phase, in which all are using Filsuvez for two years to heal their wounds. The goal is to evaluate the therapy’s safety over the long-term.(3) |
Safety |
Filsuvez has no FDA labeled contraindications for use.(1) |
REFERENCES
Number |
Reference |
1 |
Filsuvez prescribing information. Lichtenheldt GmbH. December 2023. |
2 |
Fine JD. Inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010 May 28;5:12. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-12 |
3 |
Figueiredo, M. Filsuvez gel becomes 1st therapy approved in EU for EB wounds. Epidermolysis Bullosa News. June 2022. https://epidermolysisbullosanews.com/news/filsuvez-gel-becomes-1st-therapy-approved-eu-eb-wounds. |
4 |
EB Research Network. EB research network: understanding EB & its classification. 2022. https://www.eb-researchnetwork.org/research/what-is-eb/. |
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent(s) |
Target Generic Agent(s) |
Strength |
Targeted MSC |
Available MSC |
Final Age Limit |
Preferred Status |
|
||||||
Filsuvez |
birch triterpenes gel |
10 % |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
CLIENT SUMMARY – PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Filsuvez |
birch triterpenes gel |
10 % |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
||
PA |
Initial Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 4 months
Renewal Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 month |
This pharmacy policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All pharmacy policies are based on (i) information in FDA approved package inserts (and black box warning, alerts, or other information disseminated by the FDA as applicable); (ii) research of current medical and pharmacy literature; and/or (iii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.
The purpose of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama’s pharmacy policies are to provide a guide to coverage. Pharmacy policies are not intended to dictate to physicians how to practice medicine. Physicians should exercise their medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients.
Neither this policy, nor the successful adjudication of a pharmacy claim, is guarantee of payment.