Asset Publisher
Weight Management Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary
Policy Number: PH-91228
This is an optional program that applies to Blue Partner, Commercial, GenPlus, NetResults A series, and SourceRx formularies.
POLICY REVIEW CYCLE
Effective Date |
Date of Origin |
01-01-2025 |
10-01-2024 |
FDA LABELED INDICATIONS AND DOSAGE
Agent(s) |
FDA Indication(s) |
Notes |
Ref# |
Saxenda® (liraglutide) Subcutaneous injection solution |
Adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management in:
Limitations of Use:
|
|
1 |
Wegovy® (semaglutide) Subcutaneous injection solution |
In combination with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity:
Limitations of Use: Coadministration with other semaglutide-containing products or with any other GLP-1 receptor agonist is not recommended |
|
2 |
Zepbound® (tirzepatide) Subcutaneous injection solution Vial |
As an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management in adults with an initial body mass index (BMI) of:
Limitations of Use:
|
|
3 |
See package insert for FDA prescribing information: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm
CLINICAL RATIONALE
Obesity |
Obesity rates have increased sharply over the last 30 years, creating a global public health crisis. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys show that nearly 2 of 3 US adults are overweight or obese, and 1 of 3 adults are obese. Adults with body mass index (BMI) 25-29.9 kg/m^2 are considered overweight; those with BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m^2 are considered obese.(5) Weight loss is difficult for most people and weight loss medications help reinforce behavioral strategies to lose weight. Medications for weight loss do not work on their own. Numerous guidelines recommend the addition of weight loss medications only in conjunction with lifestyle and behavioral modifications.(4,5,6,11) GLP-1 is an endogenous incretin hormone produced by L cells within the intestinal mucosa in response to the intake of nutrients. GLP-1 receptors are expressed in multiple organs, including pancreas, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, heart, brain, kidney, lung, and thyroid. This ubiquitous expression of GLP-1 receptors could be the reason for its pleiotropic benefits for T2DM, weight loss, and cardio protection. GLP-1 has numerous metabolic effects, including but not limited to, glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion, delayed gastric emptying, inhibition of food intake, and modulation of β-cell proliferation. Semaglutide was approved for the management of obesity in 2021. Having a dose–response effect on weight loss, semaglutide was approved at doses higher than indicated for T2DM. GLP-1 RAs do not have the same neuropsychiatric adverse effects as other FDA-approved drugs on the market. Other benefits include inherent glucoregulatory properties and cardio protection in select populations.(11) The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity recommends the following:(5)
*Certain ethnicities (A BMI cutoff point value of greater than or equal to 23 kg/m^2 should be used in the screening and confirmation of excess adiposity in South Asian, Southeast Asian, and East Asian adults) The Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines suggests medications approved for chronic weight management can be useful adjuncts to lifestyle change for patients who have been unsuccessful with diet and exercise alone. They recommend adherence to American Heart Association Guidelines (2013) [see below] which include advice for assessment and treatment with diet and exercise, as well as bariatric surgery for appropriate candidates.(4)
The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Obesity Society Guideline (2013) suggests if weight and lifestyle history indicates the patient has never participated in a comprehensive lifestyle intervention program as defined in the guidelines (i.e., trained interventionist or nutritional professional supervision of diet, exercise, and behavior therapy), it is recommended that the patient undertake such a program before addition of adjunctive therapies (e.g., pharmacotherapy), since a substantial proportion of patients will lose sufficient weight to improve health with comprehensive lifestyle management alone. If a patient has been unable to lose weight or sustain weight loss with comprehensive lifestyle intervention and has BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m^2 or greater than or equal to 27 kg/m^2 with greater than or equal to 1 obesity-associated comorbid condition(s), adjunctive therapy may be considered. The expert panel did not review comprehensive evidence on pharmacotherapy for weight loss. Medications should be FDA approved and clinicians should be knowledgeable about the product label. The provider should weigh potential risks of the medication vs. potential benefits of successful weight loss for the individual patient. If the patient is currently taking an obesity medication but has not lost at least 5% of initial body weight after 12 weeks on a maximal dose of the medication, the provider should reassess the risk-to-benefit ratio of that medication for the patient and consider discontinuation of that drug.(6) The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) clinical practice guidelines (2022) strongly recommended the use of pharmacotherapy in addition to lifestyle intervention in adults with overweight and obesity (body mass index 30 kg/m^2 or greater, or 27 kg/m^2 or greater with weight-related complications) who have an inadequate response to lifestyle interventions. The panel suggested the use of semaglutide 2.4 mg, liraglutide 3.0 mg, phentermine-topiramate ER, and naltrexone-bupropion ER (based on moderate certainty evidence), and phentermine and diethylpropion (based on low certainty evidence), for long-term management of overweight and obesity. The guideline panel suggested against the use of orlistat. The panel identified the use of Gelesis100 oral superabsorbent hydrogel as a knowledge gap.(11) |
Pediatric Obesity |
Pediatric obesity has become an epidemic and international problem. In the United States, the prevalence of obesity in children has risen from 5% in 1970 to 17% in 2004. Genetics and environment are the underlying causes of the increase in pediatric obesity. Obese children and adolescents are at risk of developing the same comorbid conditions as obese and overweight adults. Obesity and overweight in children are defined on percentages specific for age and gender defined BMI values. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) define obesity as a BMI greater than or equal to 95th percentile or a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m^2, whichever is lower, and overweight as a BMI within 85th to 94th percentile for children and adolescents 2 years of age and older.(9,10) The AAP recommends that clinicians should assess medical and behavioral risks in any child with a BMI above the 85th percentile before initiating any intervention.(9,10) The Endocrine Society Pediatric Obesity Treatment Guidelines also recommend that clinicians should evaluate for potential comorbidities in children and adolescents with a BMI greater than or equal to 85th percentile.(8) The 2023 AAP guidelines recommend the use of weight loss agents in conjunction with lifestyle and behavioral changes. Pediatricians and other primary healthcare providers should treat children and adolescents for overweight with comorbidities (BMI greater than or equal to 85th percentile; comorbidities such as dyslipidemia, prediabetes, Type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease, hypertension) and obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 95th percentile).(10) The 2017 Endocrine Society guidelines only recommend the use of FDA approved pharmacotherapy in pediatric patients as adjunctive therapy to lifestyle modifications of the highest intensity available and only by clinicians that are experienced in the use of anti-obesity agents.(8)
|
Cardiovascular |
Wegovy (semaglutide) was studied to determine its effect relative to placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when added to current standard of care, which included management of cardiovascular risk factors and individualized healthy lifestyle counseling (including diet and physical activity), in patients who are overweight or with obesity, and without diabetes. The primary endpoint, MACE, was the time to first occurrence of a three-part composite outcome which included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Inclusion requirements of the trial included:(12)
Guidelines recommend that patients work towards a goal of tobacco cessation and avoiding tobacco exposure, managing hypertension to goal, and managing lipid levels to goal as risk reduction measures for CVD secondary prevention.(13,14,15) |
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) |
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. SLD occurs when your body begins storing fat in your liver. While some fat in your liver is normal, when more than 5 to 10% of the liver's weight is fat, it is classified as steatosis. MASLD and ALD (alcohol intake >50 g/day for females and >60 g/day for males) comprise the most common causes of SLD. A new category, requiring further characterization, termed MetALD, describes those with MASLD who consume greater amounts of alcohol (20-50 g/day for females and 30-60 g/day for males, respectively), but do not meet the criteria for ALD. The history of alcohol consumption is an important factor as the current drinking pattern may not necessarily reflect previous drinking behavior. Importantly, despite sharing the same prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, MetALD is associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, underpinning MetALD as a distinct subclass of SLD with poorer prognosis. Therefore, diagnostic and treatment recommendations provided for MASLD cannot be extended to the MetALD population.(19,22,27,28) The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). With MASH, fat buildup progresses to inflammation, then tissue damage and scarring (fibrosis). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is inflammation of the liver caused by excess fat cell deposits in it (steatotic liver disease). MASH is characterized by histological features of hepatocellular ballooning and lobular inflammation. Chronic inflammation causes progressive liver damage. MASL refers to the presence of MASLD in the absence of steatohepatitis.(19,27,28) Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease, and its prevalence will likely continue to rise. Often, MASLD has no symptoms. When symptoms do occur, they may include fatigue, weakness, weight loss, loss of appetite, nausea, abdominal pain, spider-like blood vessels, yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice), itching, fluid buildup and swelling of the legs (edema) and abdomen (ascites), and mental confusion. MASLD is initially suspected if blood tests show high levels of liver enzymes with an absence of chronic alcohol intake. However, other liver diseases are first ruled out through additional tests (e.g., Wilson's disease, hepatitis).(19,20,21) The presence of MASLD is tightly linked to type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity and other cardiometabolic risk factors. Studies suggest that one-third to two-thirds of people with type 2 diabetes have MASLD. Research suggests that MASLD is present in up to 75% of people who are overweight and in more than 90% of people who have severe obesity. MASLD is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, chronic kidney disease, hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies, and liver-related outcomes, including liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, the high socio-economic burden of MASLD poses a global health challenge that needs to be addressed by medical societies and policymakers.(19,27,28) The following are the adult cardiometabolic risk factors (at least 1 out of 5) in the definition of MASLD:(27,28)
The 2021 AACE and 2023 AASLD practice guidelines suggest the following: Clinicians should identify individuals with obesity, metabolic syndrome traits, pre-diabetes, or type 2 diabetes, as well as those showing hepatic steatosis on imaging or persistently high plasma aminotransferase levels (over six months) as "high risk" and recommend screening for NAFLD/MASLD and advanced fibrosis. Metabolic syndrome is characterized by any three of the following: obesity, hypertension, high blood triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and insulin resistance.(19,21) An initial evaluation for individuals suspected of having hepatic steatosis based on imaging findings should include tests to rule out other causes of liver disease (e.g., hepatitis B and C serology, autoantibody panels, and metabolic syndrome evaluations). It's important to note that many laboratory normal ranges are higher than the accepted thresholds for NAFLD/MASLD, where normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels typically range from 29 to 33 U/L in men and from 19 to 25 U/L in women.(19,21,22) The American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) guidelines recommend best practices for diagnosing MASH/MASLD:(24)
NITs (non-invasive tests) derived from clinical variables can estimate the presence of advanced fibrosis. Several have been developed (e.g., FIB-4, NAFLD/MASLD Fibrosis Score, AST Platelet Ratio Index); however, FIB-4 is the most validated. FIB-4 is calculated using a simple algorithm based upon age, ALT, AST, and platelet count and outperforms other calculations in its ability to identify patients with a low probability of advanced fibrosis. The FIB-4 index can be calculated from age and three parameters obtained in routine laboratory assessments: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and platelet count. A change in FIB-4 status category from low risk (<1.3) to intermediate risk (1.3–2.67) to high risk (>2.67) may be used to assess clinical progression. Although FIB-4 is statistically inferior to other serum-based fibrosis markers such as the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel, FIBROSpect II, and imaging-based elastography methods to detect advanced fibrosis, FIB-4 is still recommended as a first-line assessment for general practitioners and endocrinologists based on its simplicity and minimal added cost.(19,23,24) Those who may have a moderate or high risk of advanced disease based on FIB-4 should undergo secondary risk assessment. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) (e.g., FibroScan) is the most commonly used method to assess liver stiffness and can be used to exclude significant hepatic fibrosis. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is more sensitive than VCTE in the detection of fibrosis stage greater than 2 and is considered to be the most accurate noninvasive imaging-based biomarker of fibrosis in NAFLD/MASLD. Although MRE is not a first-line approach to risk stratification in a patient with NAFLD/MASLD, it can be an important tool if clinical uncertainty exists, if there is a need for concomitant cross-sectional imaging, or when other elastography techniques are unavailable. Among patients with cirrhosis, a baseline liver stiffness measure (LSM) by MRE predicts future risk of incident hepatic decompensation and death. Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) as a point-of-care technique may also be used to identify steatosis. A liver biopsy is the optimal approach to confirm the diagnosis and stage of the severity of liver fibrosis. However, it is recognized that this may not be feasible or acceptable to several individuals.(19,23,24) Research findings have suggested that patients with NAFLD/MASLD exhibit lower levels of biologically active incretin hormones when compared to healthy individuals and this may be attributed to either an increased degradation of these hormones by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) or a diminished production of these hormones. GLP-1RAs can exert control over energy intake and weight gain through mechanisms such as prolonging gastric emptying and suppressing appetite. These effects help regulate food consumption and contribute to weight management. Additionally, GLP-1RAs have shown the ability to enhance liver enzyme functions, alleviate liver steatosis, and notably reduce liver fat content. Semaglutide, a second-generation GLP-1-RA, is available in both oral (daily administration) and subcutaneous (weekly administration) formulations. Clinical studies have provided evidence of the favorable effects of semaglutide in patients with NAFLD/MASLD. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comprehensive systematic reviews or meta-analyses that have extensively summarized and quantified these effects. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of a 24-week administration of semaglutide in patients with NAFLD/MASLD or NASH/MASH.(18) A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted (six hundred studies were screened and eight were included) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24 weeks of semaglutide treatment in patients with NAFLD/MASLD or NASH/MASH. The following were concluded:(18)
The 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) guidelines suggest in adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification which includes weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption. In addition, they recommend optimal management of comorbidities, including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g., semaglutide, tirzepatide) for type 2 diabetes or obesity, if indicated. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage greater than or equal 2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.(27) While an initial study with liraglutide indicated a histological benefit in MASH, drugs that are being developed for MASH now include semaglutide, and dual GLP1-GIP (e.g., tirzepatide), dual GLP1-glucagon (e.g., cotadutide, survodutide, efinopegdutide) or triple GLP1-GIP-glucagon (e.g., retatrutide) agonists. The largest available trial on semaglutide in MASH (vs. placebo over an 18-month treatment period) demonstrated resolution of steatohepatitis but no fibrosis improvement. A large registrational, phase III study with semaglutide is ongoing. Combining semaglutide with lipogenesis inhibitors may provide additional benefit and such approaches are being tested in larger trials. Histology data are not yet available for the newer dual and triple agonists. Tirzepatide (GLP1-GIP RA) has been shown to significantly reduce both liver and visceral fat in those with type 2 diabetes, in association with major weight loss (comparable to bariatric surgery), and promising results on steatohepatitis resolution from a phase II study in MASH have been communicated. Dual GLP1-glucagon RAs (cotadutide and efinopegdutide) have also been shown to improve liver steatosis, liver enzymes and indexes of fibrosis in individuals with MASLD.(17,27) |
Efficacy |
SELECT Trial (Wegovy) Study 1 (NCT03574597) was a multi-national, multi-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine the effect of Wegovy relative to placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when added to current standard of care, which included management of CV risk factors and individualized healthy lifestyle counseling (including diet and physical activity). The primary endpoint, MACE, was the time to first occurrence of a three-part composite outcome which included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. All patients were 45 years or older, with an initial BMI of 27 kg/m2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease (prior myocardial infarction, prior stroke, or peripheral arterial disease). Patients with a history of type 1 or type 2 diabetes were excluded.(2) In this trial, 17,604 patients were randomized to Wegovy or placebo. At baseline, the mean age was 62 years and 12,732 patients (72.3%) were male. The mean BMI was 33 kg/m^2, and 12,580 patients (71.5%) met the BMI criterion for obesity (≥30). The mean glycated hemoglobin level was 5.8%, and 11,696 patients (66.4%) met the glycated hemoglobin criterion for prediabetes (defined as a mean level of 5.7 to 6.4%). At baseline, prior myocardial infarction was reported in 76% of randomized individuals, prior stroke in 23%, and peripheral arterial disease in 9%. Heart failure was reported in 24% of patients. At baseline, cardiovascular disease and risk factors were managed with lipid lowering therapy (90%), platelet aggregation inhibitors (86%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (74%), and beta blockers (70%). A total of 10% had moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30 to <60 mL/min/1.73m2 ) and 0.4% had severe renal impairment eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2.(2,16) Patients were randomly assigned, with the use of a centralized system in a double-blind manner and in a 1:1 ratio without stratification, to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg or placebo. The starting dose of semaglutide was 0.24 mg once weekly, and the dose was increased every 4 weeks (to once weekly doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 mg) until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached after 16 weeks. If dose escalation led to unacceptable adverse effects, the dose-escalation intervals could be extended, treatment could be paused, or maintenance doses below the 2.4 mg per week target dose could be used.(16) Among the 17,604 patients with a BMI of 27 or greater and preexisting cardiovascular disease but without diabetes, treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg for a mean duration of 33 months reduced the risk of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke by 20% (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.90).
NASH Trial A 72-week, double-blind phase 2 trial (NCT02970942) involving patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and liver fibrosis of stage F1, F2, or F3 patients were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg or corresponding placebo. The primary end point was resolution of NASH with no worsening of fibrosis. The confirmatory secondary end point was an improvement of at least one fibrosis stage with no worsening of NASH. The analyses of these end points were performed only in patients with stage F2 or F3 fibrosis; other analyses were performed in all the patients.(25) In total, 320 patients (of whom 230 had stage F2 or F3 fibrosis) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide at a dose of 0.1 mg (80 patients), 0.2 mg (78 patients), or 0.4 mg (82 patients) or to receive placebo (80 patients). The percentage of patients in whom NASH resolution was achieved with no worsening of fibrosis was 40% in the 0.1-mg group, 36% in the 0.2-mg group, 59% in the 0.4-mg group, and 17% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for semaglutide 0.4 mg vs. placebo). An improvement in fibrosis stage occurred in 43% of the patients in the 0.4-mg group and in 33% of the patients in the placebo group (P = 0.48). The mean percent weight loss was 13% in the 0.4-mg group and 1% in the placebo group.(17,25,26) This phase 2 trial involving patients with NASH showed that treatment with semaglutide resulted in a significantly higher percentage of patients with NASH resolution than placebo. However, the trial did not show a significant between-group difference in the percentage of patients with an improvement in fibrosis stage.(25) |
Safety |
Liraglutide has the following:(1)
Semaglutide has the following:(2)
Tirzepatide has the following:(3)
Co-Administration None of the FDA approved weight loss agents have approval for co-administration with another weight loss agent. New guidelines do not support the use of co-administration of weight loss pharmacological agents.(4,5,10) Use of non-approved drug combinations for obesity treatment should be limited to clinical trials, and patients should be informed when drugs are being used off label alone or in combination.(6) |
REFERENCES
Number |
Reference |
1 |
Saxenda prescribing information. Novo Nordisk Inc. April 2023. |
2 |
Wegovy prescribing information. Novo Nordisk Inc. March 2024. |
3 |
Zepbound prescribing information. Lilly USA, LLC. March 2024. |
4 |
Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, et al. Pharmacological Management of Obesity: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):342–362. |
5 |
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Comprehensive Clinical Practice Guidelines for Medical Care of Patients with Obesity. Endocr Pract. 2016 Jul:22(Suppl 3):1-203. |
6 |
Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S102–S138. |
7 |
Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Long-Term Drug Treatment for Obesity: A Systematic and Clinical Review. JAMA. 2014 Jan;311(1):74-86. |
8 |
Styne DM, Arslanian SA, Connor EL, et al. Pediatric Obesity - Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jan;102(3):709–757. |
9 |
Barlow SE, et al. Expert Committee Recommendations Regarding the Prevention, Assessment, and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity: Summary Report. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(Suppl 4):S164-S192. |
10 |
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Obesity. Pediatrics. 2023 Jan;151(2):1-100. |
11 |
American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Guideline on Pharmacological Interventions for Adults with Obesity. Gastroenterology. 2022 Nov;163(5):1198-1225. |
12 |
Ryan DH, Lingvay I, Colhoun HM, et al. Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People With Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) rationale and design. American Heart Journal. 2020;229:61-69. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2020.07.008. |
13 |
Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Circulation. 2011;124(22):2458-2473. doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318235eb4d. |
14 |
Kleindorfer D, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52(7). doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000375. |
15 |
Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148(9). doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001168. |
16 |
Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307563. |
17 |
Harrison SA, Loomba R, Dubourg J, Ratziu V, Noureddin M. Clinical trial landscape in NASH. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2023;21(8):2001-2014. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.041. |
18 |
Bandyopadhyay S, Das S, Samajdar SS, Joshi SR. Role of semaglutide in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023;17(10):102849. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102849. |
19 |
Rinella, Mary E, Neuschwander-Tetri, Brent A, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 77(5):p 1797-1835, May 2023. DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323. |
20 |
Nash causes & risk factors. American Liver Foundation. (2023, November 1). https://liverfoundation.org/liver-diseases/fatty-liver-disease/nonalcoholic-steatohepatitis-nash/nash-causes-risk-factors/. |
21 |
Cusi K, Isaacs S, Barb D, et al., American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Primary Care and Endocrinology Clinical Settings: Co-Sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). Endocr Pract. 2022 May;28(5):528-562. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.03.010. |
22 |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2023). Drinking levels defined. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/moderate-binge-drinking. |
23 |
Blanco-Grau A, et al., Assessing Liver Fibrosis Using the FIB4 Index in the Community Setting. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;11(12):2236. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122236. |
24 |
Wattacheril J, Abdelmalek MF, Lim JK, Sanyal AJ. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of noninvasive biomarkers in the evaluation and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver Disease: Expert review. Gastroenterology. 2023;165(4):1080-1088. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.013. |
25 |
Newsome PN, Buchholtz K, Cusi K, et al. A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(12):1113-1124. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2028395 |
26 |
Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Three Dose Levels of Subcutaneous Semaglutide Once Daily Versus Placebo in Subjects With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02970942. |
27 |
Tacke F, Horn P, Wong VWS, et al. EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Journal of Hepatology. Published online June 1, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031. |
28 |
Kanwal F, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Rinella ME. Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease: Update and impact of new nomenclature on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidance on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2023;79(5):1212-1219. doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000670. |
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent(s) |
Target Generic Agent(s) |
Strength |
Targeted MSC |
Available MSC |
Final Age Limit |
Preferred Status |
|
||||||
Saxenda |
liraglutide (weight mngmt) soln pen-inj |
18 MG/3ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
Wegovy |
semaglutide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
0.25 MG/0.5ML ; 0.5 MG/0.5ML ; 1 MG/0.5ML ; 1.7 MG/0.75ML ; 2.4 MG/0.75ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
2.5 MG/0.5ML ; 5 MG/0.5ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
10 MG/0.5ML ; 12.5 MG/0.5ML ; 15 MG/0.5ML ; 2.5 MG/0.5ML ; 5 MG/0.5ML ; 7.5 MG/0.5ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY QUANTITY LIMIT
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
QL Amount |
Dose Form |
Day Supply |
Duration |
Addtl QL Info |
Allowed Exceptions |
Targeted NDCs When Exclusions Exist |
|
|||||||||
Saxenda |
Liraglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Pen-Inj 18 MG/3ML (6 MG/ML) |
18 MG/3ML |
15 |
mLs |
30 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
0.25 MG/0.5ML |
8 |
Pens |
180 |
DAYS |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing |
|
|
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
0.5 MG/0.5ML |
8 |
Pens |
180 |
DAYS |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing for pediatric patients |
|
|
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
1 MG/0.5ML |
8 |
Pens |
180 |
DAYS |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing for pediatric patients |
|
|
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
1.7 MG/0.75ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
2.4 MG/0.75ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
2.5 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Vials |
180 |
DAYS |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing |
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
5 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Vials |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
2.5 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Pens |
180 |
DAYS |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing |
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
5 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
7.5 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
10 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
12.5 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
15 MG/0.5ML |
4 |
Pens |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL QUANTITY LIMIT INFORMATION
Wildcard |
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Additional QL Information |
Targeted NDCs When Exclusions Exist |
Effective Date |
Term Date |
|
|||||||
6125207000D520 |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
0.25 MG/0.5ML |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing |
|
|
|
6125207000D525 |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
0.5 MG/0.5ML |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing for pediatric patients |
|
|
|
6125207000D530 |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
1 MG/0.5ML |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing for pediatric patients |
|
|
|
61252580002018 |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
2.5 MG/0.5ML |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing |
|
|
|
6125258000D520 |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
2.5 MG/0.5ML |
*This strength is not approvable for maintenance dosing |
|
|
|
CLIENT SUMMARY – PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Saxenda |
liraglutide (weight mngmt) soln pen-inj |
18 MG/3ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Wegovy |
semaglutide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
0.25 MG/0.5ML ; 0.5 MG/0.5ML ; 1 MG/0.5ML ; 1.7 MG/0.75ML ; 2.4 MG/0.75ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
2.5 MG/0.5ML ; 5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
10 MG/0.5ML ; 12.5 MG/0.5ML ; 15 MG/0.5ML ; 2.5 MG/0.5ML ; 5 MG/0.5ML ; 7.5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
CLIENT SUMMARY – QUANTITY LIMITS
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
Saxenda |
Liraglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Pen-Inj 18 MG/3ML (6 MG/ML) |
18 MG/3ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
0.25 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
1.7 MG/0.75ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
0.5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
1 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Wegovy |
Semaglutide (Weight Mngmt) Soln Auto-Injector |
2.4 MG/0.75ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln |
2.5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
10 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
2.5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
7.5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
12.5 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
Zepbound |
tirzepatide (weight mngmt) soln auto-injector |
15 MG/0.5ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx |
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
Initial Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL the following are met:
Length of Approval:
NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria.
Renewal Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria |
QUANTITY LIMIT CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
QL |
Quantity limit for the Target Agent(s) will be approved when ONE of the following is met:
Length of Approval: up to 12 months |
This pharmacy policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All pharmacy policies are based on (i) information in FDA approved package inserts (and black box warning, alerts, or other information disseminated by the FDA as applicable); (ii) research of current medical and pharmacy literature; and/or (iii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.
The purpose of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama’s pharmacy policies are to provide a guide to coverage. Pharmacy policies are not intended to dictate to physicians how to practice medicine. Physicians should exercise their medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients.
Neither this policy, nor the successful adjudication of a pharmacy claim, is guarantee of payment.
Commercial _ PS _ PS_Weight_Management_PAQL _ProgSum_ 01-01-2025