Asset Publisher
Empaveli (pegcetacoplan) Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary
Policy Number: PH-91154
This program applies to Blue Partner, Commercial, GenPlus, NetResults A series, SourceRx and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies.
POLICY REVIEW CYCLE
|
Effective Date |
Date of Origin |
|
01-01-2026 |
10-01-2021 |
FDA LABELED INDICATIONS AND DOSAGE
|
Agent(s) |
FDA Indication(s) |
Notes |
Ref# |
|
Empaveli® (pegcetacoplan) Injection for subcutaneous use |
Treatment of adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) Treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) or primary immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN), to reduce proteinuria |
|
1 |
See package insert for FDA prescribing information: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm
CLINICAL RATIONALE
|
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria |
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a chronic, progressive, life-threatening, rare, multi-systemic disease developing as a result of a somatic mutation of hematopoietic stem cells, and characterized by clonal, complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis. A mutation in the X-linked gene phosphatidylinositol glycan class A (PIGA) results in a deficiency in the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) protein, which is responsible for anchoring proteins to the surface of red blood cells.(3) This lack of anchoring leads to hemolysis and complications such as hemolytic anemia and thrombosis.(3) PNH is mainly a disease of adults with a median age of onset in the thirties. High precision flow cytometry is the most useful and accepted diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of PNH. Flow cytometry is performed by incubating the patient’s peripheral blood cells with fluorescently-labeled monoclonal antibodies that bind to GPI anchored proteins, which are reduced or absent on blood cells in PNH. Since different blood cell lineages display different combinations of GPI-linked proteins, and some proteins bind to cell surfaces via both GPI-linked and GPI-independent mechanisms, it is recommended that at least two independent flow cytometry reagents be used on at least two cell lineages (e.g., red blood cells [RBCs] and white blood cells [WBCs]) to establish a diagnosis of PNH.(2) The lack of the complement inhibitor CD59 on RBCs surface is mostly responsible for the clinical manifestations of PNH. These patients manifest with chronic intravascular hemolysis, paroxysmal flares of hemolysis, and a propensity for thrombosis. Intravascular hemolysis leads to release of free hemoglobin (Hb) into the blood. Free Hb, in turn, can cause various toxic effects, including hypercoagulability, changes in vascular tone from reduction of circulating nitric oxide, and renal damage.(3) Extravascular hemolysis also occurs in patients with PNH because C3 fragments that are not destroyed by the membrane attack complex (MAC) intravascularly can accumulate on the GPI-negative RBCs (lacking CD55) surface and these fragments opsonize the RBCs, causing reticuloendothelial destruction in the liver and spleen.(3) The main clinical situations or diseases that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of PNH are:(3)
PNH is classified into three different categories:(3)
Historically, patients with PNH had a median survival of ten years after diagnosis however, since the development of complement inhibitors survival rates have improved to approximately 75%.(4) The approach to therapy depends on the severity of symptoms and the degree of hemolysis. The treatment options for PNH are supportive care (e.g., iron supplementation, transfusions, anticoagulation), allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and complement blockade.(2,3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Complement 3 Glomerulopathy |
Complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is a progressive and ultra-rare (5 cases per 1,000,000 in the United States) kidney disease that is characterized by dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway.(5) The disease can be divided into two major subgroups, dense deposit disease (DDD) and C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN). While these two subgroups have unique characteristics that can be differentiated with a kidney biopsy and electron microscopy, they both cause excessive activation of the alternative complement pathway.(6) It is estimated that within 10 years of diagnosis, almost 50% of patients with C3G will progress to end-stage kidney disease.(7) The clinical presentation of C3G can be highly variable. Most patients will present with proteinuria and/or hematuria, hypertension, complement abnormalities (low serum C3 levels), and kidney function decline. The onset of disease can also be variable affecting both pediatric and adult patients. The mean age at diagnosis is 9 and 39 years.(7) Kidney biopsy is required to confirm the diagnosis of C3G.(8) Guidelines recommend treating patients with C3G who have proteinuria greater than 1 g/d.(8) Proteinuria of 1 g/d is approximately equivalent to a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of 0.88 g/g.(9) Historically, treatment options for C3G have been limited and have focused more on supportive measures (e.g., blood pressure management, lifestyle modification, diet). Therapeutic decisions are driven by disease severity and several off-label therapies have shown mixed results.(6) Most experts recommend renin angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) therapy, and in some patients immunosuppressants are used as first-line agents. Furthermore, the recommendation to use immunosuppressants (corticosteroids and mycophenolate based regimens) is largely based on a few retrospective studies and well controlled studies are unavailable.(6,7,8) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis |
Immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) is a rare kidney disease that shares many similarities with C3G. The two diseases are differentiated by glomerular deposits of C3 in the presence or absence of immune complexes as seen on kidney biopsy.(10) ICGN is characterized by the deposition of immune complexes which is most commonly a secondary result of infections (e.g., hepatitis B & C, bacterial, protozoal) or an autoimmune disorder (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis). The clinical presentation of IC-MPGN is similar to C3G with most patients presenting with proteinuria and/or hematuria, hypertension, and kidney function decline.(10,11) Kidney biopsy is required to confirm the diagnosis of IC-MPGN and therapeutic decisions are driven by disease severity. KDIGO guidelines recommend supportive care (e.g., renin angiotensin system inhibitor [RASi]) for all patients as renoprotective benefit has been demonstrated across a number of active glomerular diseases. The use of immunosuppressants should be carefully considered and may only be appropriate for patients with active inflammation.(8,11) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Efficacy |
The efficacy and safety of Empaveli in patients with PNH were assessed in two open-label, randomized-controlled Phase 3 studies (NCT03500549 and NCT04085601). The first study (NCT03500549) enrolled patients with PNH who had been treated with a stable dose of eculizumab for at least the previous 3 months and with Hb levels less than 10.5 g/dL. Eligible patients entered a 4-week run-in period during which they received Empaveli 1,080 mg subcutaneously twice weekly in addition to their current dose of eculizumab. Patients were then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1,080 mg of Empaveli twice weekly or their current dose of eculizumab through the duration of the 16-week randomized controlled period. If required due to a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 2 X the upper limit of normal (ULN), the dose of Empaveli could be adjusted to 1,080 mg every three days.(1) The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 16 (during randomized controlled period) in Hb level. Baseline was defined as the average of measurements recorded prior to taking the first dose of Empaveli. Secondary efficacy endpoints included transfusion avoidance, defined as the proportion of patients who did not require a transfusion during the randomized controlled period, and change from baseline to week 16 in absolute reticulocyte count (ARC).(1) Empaveli was superior to eculizumab for the change from baseline in Hb level at week 16 (P<0.0001). The adjusted mean change from baseline in Hb level was 2.37 g/dL in the group treated with Empaveli versus -1.47 g/dL in the eculizumab group, demonstrating an adjusted mean increase of 3.84 g/dL with Empaveli compared to eculizumab at week 16 (95% CI, 2.33-5.34). Non-inferiority was demonstrated in the endpoints of transfusion avoidance and change from baseline in ARC.(1) The second study (NCT04085601) enrolled patients with PNH who had not been treated with any complement inhibitor within 3 months prior to enrollment and with Hb levels less than the lower limit of normal. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive Empaveli or supportive care (control arm) (excluding complement inhibitors [e.g., transfusions, corticosteroids, supplements such as iron, folate, and vitamin B12]) through the duration of the 26-week treatment period. The primary efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving Hb stabilization, defined as avoidance of a > 1 g/dL decrease in Hb levels from baseline in the absence of transfusion, and the change from baseline in LDH level. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in ARC, change from baseline in Hb, and transfusion avoidance, defined as the proportion of patients who did not require a transfusion through week 26. Baseline was defined as the average of measurements recorded prior to taking the first dose of Empaveli or prior to randomization to the control arm treatment group. Efficacy results are shown below.(1)
The efficacy of Empaveli in reducing proteinuria in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with native kidney C3G, native kidney IC-MPGN, or recurrent C3G following kidney transplant was demonstrated in Study APL2-C3G-310. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that included 124 adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older (weighing at least 30 kg). Eligible patients had biopsy-proven, eGFR greater than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and proteinuria greater than or equal to 1 g/day. Patients were required to be on stable and optimized doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and/or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for at least 12 weeks before randomization and throughout the 26 week treatment period. Patients were randomized (1:1) to Empaveli or placebo, administered twice weekly as a subcutaneous infusion. The primary efficacy endpoint was the log-transformed ratio of UPCR (sampled from first morning urine collections) at week 26 compared to baseline. At week 26, the geometric mean UPCR ratio relative to baseline was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.43) in the Empaveli group and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.16) in the placebo group. This resulted in a 68% reduction in UPCR from baseline for the treatment group versus placebo (p<0.0001).(1) There is no evidence to support concomitant use of Empaveli with another complement inhibitor (e.g., eculizumab [Soliris, biosimilars], Ultomiris [ravulizumab-cwvz], Piasky [crovalimab-akkz], Fabhalta [iptacopan]). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Safety |
Empaveli contains the following boxed warnings:(1)
Empaveli is contraindicated in the following:(1)
Empaveli is available only through a restricted program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) called the Empaveli REMS.(1) |
REFERENCES
|
Number |
Reference |
|
1 |
Empaveli prescribing information. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. July 2025. |
|
2 |
Sahin F, Akay OM, Ayer M, et al. Pesg PNH diagnosis, follow-up and treatment guidelines. PubMed Central (PMC). Published 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981648/ |
|
3 |
Cançado RD, Da Silva Araújo A, Sandes AF, et al. Consensus statement for diagnosis and treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria. Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy. 2021;43(3):341-348. doi:10.1016/j.htct.2020.06.006 |
|
4 |
Shah N, Bhatt H. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. Published July 31, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562292/ |
|
5 |
Cattran DC, Sethi S. Slowly unraveling the mysteries of C3G. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2021;77(5):670-672. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.12.009. |
|
6 |
Smith RJH, Appel GB, Blom AM, et al. C3 glomerulopathy — understanding a rare complement-driven renal disease. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2019;15(3):129-143. doi:10.1038/s41581-018-0107-2. |
|
7 |
Magliulo EK, Ravipati P. C3 Glomerulopathy: A Current perspective in an evolving landscape. Glomerular Diseases. 2024;4(1):200-210. doi:10.1159/000542354. |
|
8 |
Rovin BH, Adler SG, Barratt J, et al. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney International. 2021;100(4):S1-S276. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021. |
|
9 |
Pitcher D, Braddon F, Hendry B, et al. Long-Term outcomes in IGA nephropathy. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2023;18(6):727-738. doi:10.2215/cjn.0000000000000135. |
|
10 |
Bomback AS, Charu V, Fakhouri F. Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Immune Complex-Mediated Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis and Complement 3 Glomerulopathy. Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Sep 21;10(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.09.017. |
|
11 |
Noris M, Remuzzi G. C3G and Ig-MPGN-treatment standard. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024;39(2):202-214. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad182. |
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
|
Target Brand Agent(s) |
Target Generic Agent(s) |
Strength |
Targeted MSC |
Available MSC |
Final Age Limit |
Preferred Status |
|
|
||||||
|
Empaveli |
pegcetacoplan subcutaneous soln |
1080 MG/20ML |
M ; N ; O ; Y |
N |
|
|
POLICY AGENT SUMMARY QUANTITY LIMIT
|
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
QL Amount |
Dose Form |
Day Supply |
Duration |
Addtl QL Info |
Allowed Exceptions |
Targeted NDCs When Exclusions Exist |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Empaveli |
Pegcetacoplan Subcutaneous Soln |
1080 MG/20ML |
8 |
Vials |
28 |
DAYS |
|
|
|
CLIENT SUMMARY – PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
|
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
|
Empaveli |
pegcetacoplan subcutaneous soln |
1080 MG/20ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx ; SourceRx-Performance |
CLIENT SUMMARY – QUANTITY LIMITS
|
Target Brand Agent Name(s) |
Target Generic Agent Name(s) |
Strength |
Client Formulary |
|
Empaveli |
Pegcetacoplan Subcutaneous Soln |
1080 MG/20ML |
Blue Partner ; Commercial ; GenPlus ; Health Insurance Marketplace ; NetResults A Series ; SourceRx ; SourceRx-Performance |
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
|
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
|
Initial Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 6 months for C3G & IC-MPGN; 12 months for all other indications NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria.
Renewal Evaluation Target Agent(s) will be approved when ALL of the following are met:
Length of Approval: 12 months NOTE: If Quantity Limit applies, please refer to Quantity Limit Criteria. |
QUANTITY LIMIT CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
|
Module |
Clinical Criteria for Approval |
|
QL with PA |
Quantity Limit for the Target Agent(s) will be approved when ONE of the following is met:
Length of Approval: up to 12 months NOTE: If approving for every three days dosing approve a quantity of 10 vials/30 days for 12 months |
This pharmacy policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Eligibility and benefits are determined on a case-by-case basis according to the terms of the member’s plan in effect as of the date services are rendered. All pharmacy policies are based on (i) information in FDA approved package inserts (and black box warning, alerts, or other information disseminated by the FDA as applicable); (ii) research of current medical and pharmacy literature; and/or (iii) review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease as of the date hereof. Physicians and other providers are solely responsible for all aspects of medical care and treatment, including the type, quality, and levels of care and treatment.
The purpose of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama’s pharmacy policies are to provide a guide to coverage. Pharmacy policies are not intended to dictate to physicians how to practice medicine. Physicians should exercise their medical judgment in providing the care they feel is most appropriate for their patients.
Neither this policy, nor the successful adjudication of a pharmacy claim, is guarantee of payment.
Commercial _ PS _ Empaveli_PAQL _ProgSum_ 01-01-2026